Contemporary Studies in Social Sciences

Volume 3 - Issue 2 (2) | PP: 96 - 110 Language : العربية
DOI : https://doi.org/10.31559/CSSS2025.3.2.2
93
25

Teleological Thinking in Personal Planning: A Conceptual Analysis for Adapting Results-Based Management at the Individual Level

Moataz Mostafa Abo-moch
Received Date Revised Date Accepted Date Publication Date
13/8/2025 8/9/2025 1/10/2025 21/12/2025
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to analyze the concept of Teleological Thinking as a future-oriented cognitive pattern that guides individuals in making personal decisions and plans based on a clear vision of desired future outcomes. It seeks to address a gap in Arabic literature by formulating an independent theoretical definition of this concept and linking it to the Results-Based Management (RBM) framework. Methods: The study adopted the concept analysis methodology according to Walker & Avant's eight-step model, which includes identifying the defining attributes, examining uses of the concept, constructing model cases, determining antecedents and consequences, and suggesting practical applications. Results: The analysis revealed five core attributes of teleological thinking: orientation toward long-term outcomes, linking ends to means, predictive foresight, cognitive flexibility, and reliance on a clear personal vision. Analytical cases were developed to demonstrate the distinction between this concept and related notions such as results-based thinking. Conclusions: Teleological thinking represents a promising theoretical framework for advancing personal planning models, integrating long-term vision with practical awareness to enhance decision-making effectiveness and sustainability. The study recommends developing measurement tools and training applications based on this thinking pattern, paving the way for future empirical research.


How To Cite This Article
Abo-moch , M. M. (2025). Teleological Thinking in Personal Planning: A Conceptual Analysis for Adapting Results-Based Management at the Individual Level. Contemporary Studies in Social Sciences, 3 (2), 96-110, https://doi.org/10.31559/CSSS2025.3.2.2

Copyright © 2026, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.