Volume 8 - Issue 4 (4) | PP: 163 - 176
Language : العربية
DOI : https://doi.org/10.31559/SIS2023.8.4.4
DOI : https://doi.org/10.31559/SIS2023.8.4.4
191
19
The Jurisprudential Ruling in which Voluntary Prayer Differs from Obligatory Prayer a Comparative Jurisprudential Study
Received Date | Revised Date | Accepted Date | Publication Date |
29/11/2023 | 10/12/2023 | 18/12/2023 | 25/1/2024 |
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this research is to clarify the jurisprudential rulings in which voluntary prayers differ from obligatory prayers. Methodology: The analytical method was used to explain the details of this research. Conclusion: This research has reached important results, the most prominent of which are: the basic principle regarding the obligatory prayer and the voluntary prayer is that their rulings are the same except for what the evidence stated in distinguishing between them, and it became clear that the difference in the rulings between the obligatory prayer and the voluntary prayer is small and limited.
Keywords: Voluntary Prayer, Obligatory Prayer, Jurisprudential rulings
How To Cite This Article
Al-Shabaan , A. B. A. B. S. (2024). The Jurisprudential Ruling in which Voluntary Prayer Differs from Obligatory Prayer a Comparative Jurisprudential Study . International Journal of Specialized Islamic Studies, 8 (4), 163-176, https://doi.org/10.31559/SIS2023.8.4.4
Copyright © 2024, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.